Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/11852
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRudyk, Yuriy-
dc.contributor.authorGavryliyk, Andrii-
dc.contributor.authorKuts, Victor-
dc.contributor.authorYatsuk, Vasyl-
dc.contributor.authorVinogradov, Stanislav-
dc.contributor.authorРудик Юрій Іванович-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-10T13:47:17Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-10T13:47:17Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationRudyk Y, Gavryliuk A, Kuts V, Yatsuk V and Vinogradov S. Comparative assessment of the efficiency of some car drives September, 29, 2022 International Scientific-Practical Conference Modeling and computer engineering in mechanical engineering; theory, practice and innovation, Lviv, Ukraineen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/11852-
dc.description.abstractThe fundamental basis for scientific progress is cheaper technology. Systems analysis and engineering, decision-making systems are based on data completeness and their validation. The study aims to provide the following grounds for a systematic comparison of economic and environmental performance of vehicles with different fuel drives. The issue of logistical attractiveness and compatibility for Ukraine is especially relevant today. Thus, specific fuel consumption is calculated by determining the cost of electricity that goes to charge the traction battery from the mains and is equivalently converted into the cost of fuel. The paper presents a method of calculating the equivalent fuel consumption for electric vehicles according to European (l per 100 km) and American standards (miles per 1 gallon). According to the results of fuel efficiency studies, it is established that the equivalent fuel consumption on the territory of Ukraine of the studied electric vehicles is 8-10 times lower than the fuel consumption of cars of the same class with internal combustion engines.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectequivalent fuel, electrical drive, fuel consumption, efficiency mileage, measurement unit.en_US
dc.subjectmeasurement unit.en_US
dc.subjectefficiency mileageen_US
dc.subjectequivalent fuelen_US
dc.subjectfuel consumptionen_US
dc.subjectelectrical driveen_US
dc.titleComparative assessment of the efficiency of some car drivesen_US
dcterms.referencesGavrilyuk A and Lin S 2017 Protipozhezhnij zahist kolіsnih transportnih zasobіv ta shlyahi jogo pіdvishchennya Pozhezhna bezpeka 31 pp. 11-17-
dcterms.referencesMaxwell J. Clerk 1892A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, pp.68–73.-
dcterms.referencesRamchandani M and Whitehouse N 1976 Heat transfer in a piston of a four stroke diesel engine SAE Prepr. 760007 9 p.-
dcterms.referencesKelley Blue Book [Online resource] / The Trusted Resource - Access Mode: https://www.kbb.com-
dcterms.referencesUnited States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy (2016-11-18). "Compare Side-by-Side: 2017 Hyundai Ioniq Electric." fueleconomy.gov. Retrieved 2016-11-19.-
dcterms.referencesSzostech, M Hyundai IONIQ Electric Specifications. My Electric Car Forums. Retrieved 2016-11-25.-
dcterms.referencesKane, Mark (2016-03-02). "Hyundai IONIQ Electric & IONIQ Plug-in At The Geneva Motor Show (Gallery, New Stats)." InsideEVs.com. Retrieved 2016-03-02.See more details in the official press release.-
dcterms.referencesRteslamotors - FW 2019.8.3 actually increased Model 3 AWD peak power by 8% above 45 mph (70 km / h) ". Reddit. Retrieved July 14, 2019.-
dcterms.referencesPowell, Derek (May 22, 2019). "Tesla Model 3 vs. BMW 330I vs. Genesis G70 Comparison Test." MotorTrend. US Retrieved May 25, 2019-
dcterms.referencesU. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy (July 25, 2014). "Most Efficient EPA Certified Vehicles." fueleconomy.gov. Retrieved 13 June 2015.Current Model Year excludes all-electric vehicles-
dcterms.referencesGavriluk A, Rudyk Y, Kuts V and Naumchuk R 2020 Required safety component of automotive cyber-physical systems PiCS&T IEEE Conference Proc. pp. 338-342, doi: 10.1109/PICST51311.2020.9467896.-
dcterms.referencesU. S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy (November 16, 2016). "Top Fuel Sippers (EPA Ratings, 2017 Model Year)." fueleconomy.gov. Retrieved November 21, 2016. The 2014–16 BMW i3 BEV (60 Amp-hour battery) was the most efficient EPA-certified vehicles considering all fuels and of all years until November 2016, when it was surpassed by the 2017 Hyundai Ioniq Electric-
dcterms.referencesHaschuk P and Nikipchuk S 2018 Peculiarities of heat generation in an internal combustion engine Automotive Transport 42 P. 12-21. DOI: 10.30977/АТ.2219-8342.2018.42.0.12-
dcterms.referencesDecan G, Broekaert S, Lucchini T, D’Errico G, Vierendeels I and Verhelst S 2018 Evaluation of wall heat flux calculation methods for CFD simulations of an internal combustion engine under both motored and HCCI operation Applied Energy 232 P. 451-461. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.214-
dcterms.referencesHashchuk P and Nikipchuk S 2021 Release and use of heat energy in internal combustion engines (Kyiv, Condor) 324 p ISBN 978-617-7939-69-5-
dcterms.referencesYatsuk V and Klinkovska O 2017 Peculiarities of quality assurance in the European automotive industry. 8th International science and technology conf. in memory of Professor Ihor Kisil November 14-15-
Appears in Collections:2023

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Rudyk_2023_IOP_Conf._Ser.__Mater._Sci._Eng._1277_012032.pdf1.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.