Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/19452
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPalchevska, Oleksandra-
dc.contributor.authorAleksandruk, Iryna-
dc.contributor.authorAndroshchuk, Alina-
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-12T07:26:22Z-
dc.date.available2026-11-12T07:26:22Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.citationAleksandruk, I., Palchevska, O., & Androshchuck, A. (2026). Artificial Intelligence and the Death of the Author:: Originality, Creativity and Generative Art Ontology. Dia-Noesis: A Journal of Philosophy, 20, 10–34. https://doi.org/10.12681/dia.46959en_US
dc.identifier.issn2459-413X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/19452-
dc.description.abstractThe rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly affected creative production, thus raising numerous questions on creativity, authorship, originality in general and the nature of art in particular. Creativity is one of the leading human acts, impacted by individual will, emotions, culture, and tradi tions. Nowadays, AI systems can generate whatever is required with minimal or no direct input from a human being. The aim of the article is to examine and analyze how the concept of the death of the author in a metaphorical sense discussed by Barthes is currently being turned into a technological one, as well as to address the gap regarding what kind of thing AI-generated artworks are or should be referred to. The article presents the following logical argument: if authorship and creativity are usually linked to human intention and conscious action, and if generative AI systems produce aesthetically valuable works with out consciousness or its own intention, relying only on statistical patterns, then the traditional view of art as a purely human activity no longer corresponds to the digital age. Therefore, authorship should be understood not only as a per sonal act of will by an individual, but also as a distributed process in which technologies, institutions, and cultural context play an important role. The uni fied account of originality, ontology and creativity is applied to the recent ad vances in generative AI systems. A qualitative, interpretative research design was used in this research. Three methodological approaches, including concep tual analysis, comparative textual analysis and critical discourse analysis, were utilized in this research. The concept of the death of the author was revealed to become a technological reality. The issues of originality, creativity and author ship should be reconsidered. Novel legislation and copyright law should be introduced and implemented to regulate the issues of originality, authorship and fairness. The concept of human and machine interaction is of utmost im portance in the modern digitalized world and should be reconsidered and re valuated in the near future.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectdeath of the authoren_US
dc.subjectartificial intelligence (AI)en_US
dc.subjectcreativityen_US
dc.subjectorigi nalityen_US
dc.subjectgenerative art ontologyen_US
dc.subjectauthorshipen_US
dc.titleArtificial Intelligence and the Death of the Authoren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:2026

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Palchevska Aleksandruk_t20_final.pdf468.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.