https://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/19318 2026-10-23T15:15:56Z 2026-10-23T15:15:56Z Botvyn, Tetiana Demianenko, Nataliia Stepanov, Ievgenii Harbar, Maryna Hubina, Svitlana https://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/19323 2026-10-23T07:46:09Z 2026-06-01T00:00:00Z

Title: CONTEMPORARY APPROACHES OF SLAVIC PHRASEOLOGICAL STUDIES TO GE-NERAL ISSUES OF PHR Authors: Botvyn, Tetiana; Demianenko, Nataliia; Stepanov, Ievgenii; Harbar, Maryna; Hubina, Svitlana Abstract: Contemporary linguistics devotes increasing attention to the study of the linguistic picture of the world as a reflec-tion of the mentality of an ethnic group. Phraseology is one of the most effective means of conceptualizing rea-lity. It preserves in its structure cognitively significant re-presentations of the surrounding world that are deeply embedded in the linguistic memory of a given culture. The aim of this study is to conduct a cognitive-linguistic and linguocultural analysis of phraseological symbolism in selected Slavic languages, namely Ukrainian, Polish, and Bulgarian. The methodological foundation is cogni-tive-linguistic analysis, which seeks to identify the inter-connections between linguistic form, conceptual content, and cultural codes, with theoretical grounding in cognitive linguistics. Two analytical vectors were employed: verbali-zation from sign to concept and from concept to linguistic expression. The empirical material was drawn from phra-seological dictionaries, associative and frequency databa-ses, and texts of both fiction and non-fiction literature. This approach made it possible to outline the main principles of linguocultural analysis of phraseological units. The re-sults revealed the mechanisms by which phraseological units are formed through symbolic representation of cul-turally significant concepts across the studied languages. The cross-linguistic analysis demonstrated both universal and culture-specific dimensions of phraseological symbo-lism within a broader interlingual context. The study holds practical value for translation studies, lexicography, and the development of linguocultural resources, particularly a multilingual dictionary of attributive comparisons. Its fin-dings create a solid foundation for further interlinguistic investigations in cognitive linguistics and linguocultural research. Description: Contemporary linguistics devotes increasing attention to the study of the linguistic picture of the world as a reflec-tion of the mentality of an ethnic group. Phraseology is one of the most effective means of conceptualizing rea-lity. It preserves in its structure cognitively significant re-presentations of the surrounding world that are deeply embedded in the linguistic memory of a given culture. The aim of this study is to conduct a cognitive-linguistic and linguocultural analysis of phraseological symbolism in selected Slavic languages, namely Ukrainian, Polish, and Bulgarian. The methodological foundation is cogni-tive-linguistic analysis, which seeks to identify the inter-connections between linguistic form, conceptual content, and cultural codes, with theoretical grounding in cognitive linguistics. Two analytical vectors were employed: verbali-zation from sign to concept and from concept to linguistic expression. The empirical material was drawn from phra-seological dictionaries, associative and frequency databa-ses, and texts of both fiction and non-fiction literature. This approach made it possible to outline the main principles of linguocultural analysis of phraseological units. The re-sults revealed the mechanisms by which phraseological units are formed through symbolic representation of cul-turally significant concepts across the studied languages. The cross-linguistic analysis demonstrated both universal and culture-specific dimensions of phraseological symbo-lism within a broader interlingual context. The study holds practical value for translation studies, lexicography, and the development of linguocultural resources, particularly a multilingual dictionary of attributive comparisons. Its fin-dings create a solid foundation for further interlinguistic investigations in cognitive linguistics and linguocultural research.

2026-06-01T00:00:00Z Ботвин, Тетяна Анна, Мармуляк Тетяна, Липченко Надія, Саламін Оксана, Пилипець Марія, Іванченко Тетяна, Тимощук https://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/19322 2026-10-23T07:38:15Z 2026-05-15T00:00:00Z

Title: Загальна англійська для немовних спеціальностей Authors: Ботвин, Тетяна; Анна, Мармуляк; Тетяна, Липченко; Надія, Саламін; Оксана, Пилипець; Марія, Іванченко; Тетяна, Тимощук Description: Посібник пропонує практичні завдання, розроблені для здобувачів першого (бакалаврського) рівня вищої освіти. Структура посібника включає 10 загальних тем вивчення курсу «Іноземна мова», упорядкованих у розділи. Кожен розділ містить підготовчі, вступні, пробні, тренувальні та творчі вправи, призначені для усвідомлення і засвоєння мовного матеріалу. Головною метою посібника є вироблення ключових навичок володіння іноземною мовою у здобувачів немовних спеціальностей, таких як читання, письмо, говоріння та граматика.

2026-05-15T00:00:00Z Ботвин, Тетяна Іванченко Марія https://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/19321 2026-10-23T07:49:35Z 2026-05-20T00:00:00Z

Title: TESTING AS AN EFFECTIVE METHOD OF KNOWLEDGE LEVELDETERMINATION Authors: Ботвин, Тетяна Іванченко Марія Abstract: Citation: МОВНА ПІДГОТОВКА ТА МОВНЕ ТЕСТУВАННЯ В СЕКТОРІ БЕЗПЕКИ І ОБОРОНИ: збірник матеріалів Міжнародної науково-практичної конференції на базі навчально-наукового центру іноземних мов (Київ 19-20 травня 2026 року).–Київ: Національний університет оборони України, 2026.–390 с.

2026-05-20T00:00:00Z Ботвин, Тетяна Іванченко Марія https://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/19320 2026-10-23T07:50:51Z 2026-11-11T00:00:00Z

Title: PECULIARITIES OF ENGLISH WEAPONS TERMINOLOGY TRANSLATION Authors: Ботвин, Тетяна Іванченко Марія Abstract: In recent years, the focus of linguists’ attention has been the translation of professional texts, in particular terminological units, the disclosure and transmission of foreign language realities by means of the Ukrainian language and the features of their reproduction in scientific and technical texts. In the context of the war military terminology is in the focus of attention of researchers, translators, and users. Leading scientists consider problems related to the analysis of the morphological structure of terms, the specifics of the terminological units translation. In the field of military terminology, scientists analyze the specifics of certain lexical-semantic groups of concepts in this field, raise problems of classification of Englishlanguage military vocabulary, investigate military neologisms, and study the features of the translation of terms in this field. Purpose of the article is to study the peculiarities of the English weapon terms translation into Ukrainian. The research material is the English weapon terms obtained as a result of sampling from professional dictionary. Like no other, technical translation strives for the most accurate and complete transmission of information contained in the original. Translation difficulties often arise not only because of differences in the grammatical structure of languages, but also because of the cultural and historical specificity of the native speaker’s worldview. The responsibility for the correct transmission of the content lies with the translator. Any mistake made during the translation process can distort the content of the message. Correct translation of terms is the key to effective professional communication. Since the basis of a technical text is terms, it is necessary to exclude their incorrect translation. Thus, as a result of the conducted research, it was pointed out that English terms of weapons are in most cases reproduced in Ukrainian by using tracing (47%), the translation technique of explication is somewhat less represented (19%). The translation transformations compression (11%) and inversion (10%) are used almost equally. Generalization (5%) and concretization (4%) are used less often. Key words: translation, term, transformation, equivalent, weapon. Description: In recent years, the focus of linguists’ attention has been the translation of professional texts, in particular terminological units, the disclosure and transmission of foreign language realities by means of the Ukrainian language and the features of their reproduction in scientific and technical texts. In the context of the war military terminology is in the focus of attention of researchers, translators, and users. Leading scientists consider problems related to the analysis of the morphological structure of terms, the specifics of the terminological units translation. In the field of military terminology, scientists analyze the specifics of certain lexical-semantic groups of concepts in this field, raise problems of classification of Englishlanguage military vocabulary, investigate military neologisms, and study the features of the translation of terms in this field. Purpose of the article is to study the peculiarities of the English weapon terms translation into Ukrainian. The research material is the English weapon terms obtained as a result of sampling from professional dictionary. Like no other, technical translation strives for the most accurate and complete transmission of information contained in the original. Translation difficulties often arise not only because of differences in the grammatical structure of languages, but also because of the cultural and historical specificity of the native speaker’s worldview. The responsibility for the correct transmission of the content lies with the translator. Any mistake made during the translation process can distort the content of the message. Correct translation of terms is the key to effective professional communication. Since the basis of a technical text is terms, it is necessary to exclude their incorrect translation. Thus, as a result of the conducted research, it was pointed out that English terms of weapons are in most cases reproduced in Ukrainian by using tracing (47%), the translation technique of explication is somewhat less represented (19%). The translation transformations compression (11%) and inversion (10%) are used almost equally. Generalization (5%) and concretization (4%) are used less often. Key words: translation, term, transformation, equivalent, weapon.

2026-11-11T00:00:00Z