Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/16332
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorВербицька, Лідія Олегівна-
dc.contributor.authorБабій, Ірина Володимирівна-
dc.contributor.authorКонівіцька, Тетяна Ярославівна-
dc.contributor.authorКульчицька, Марина Орестівна-
dc.contributor.authorХлипавка, Галина Григорівна-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-24T08:26:47Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-24T08:26:47Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationVerbytska, Lidiia and Babii, Iryna and Konivitska, Tetiana and Kulchytska, Maryna and Khlypavka, Halyna, Emergency Speaking Communication: Experience from the USA and Europe (March 08, 2025). OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 18 (10), 145-154, 2025., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5285737en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/16332-
dc.description.abstractFor coordination of emergency services, minimizing panic and fast response, effective voice communication in an emergency is critical. However, the approaches toward crisis communication are being changed by modern technologies, such as the use of artificial intelligence, automated alert systems, as well as multilingual platforms, yet there are still a few challenges, and these are mainly connected to the human factor on one side and intercultural adaptability of messages on the other. It is a study to analy ze peculiarities of emergency speech communication in general, and American and European experience respectively. Based on a comparative analysis of crisis communication models, content analysis of scientific publications, statistical analysis of effectiveness of digital communication technologies and cognitive analysis of the influence of stress conditions on emergency service operators, the empirical and research methodology is proposed. The research indicates that the ways in which AMERICANs and EUROPEANS communicate in crises utilize different communication approaches such as centralized automated alert systems for AMERICANs and more intercultural adaptation due to the social aspects of communication that applies to EUROPEANS. Further, the level of stress and emotional burnout of dispatchers significantly impacts the accuracy and speed of information transmission, and thus these dispatchers need of psychological aid and training preparation. It is also proved that the introduction of artificial intelligence and fake news detection algorithms can significantly reduce disinformation during crisis situations. The practical significance of the study is to formulate recommendations for improving crisis communication by integrating digital technologies, increasing the resilience of communicators to stress, and improving the adaptation of messages to the cultural characteristics of the population. Promising areas for further research are the development of adaptive models of crisis communication for a multilingual environment, the integration of artificial intelligence for personalized crisis communication, and the improvement of mechanisms to combat disinformation.en_US
dc.subjectcrisis communicationen_US
dc.subjectemergenciesen_US
dc.subjectspeech communicationen_US
dc.subjectartificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectautomated warning systemsen_US
dc.subjectintercultural adaptationen_US
dc.subjectdisinformationen_US
dc.subjectemergency servicesen_US
dc.subjectcognitive factorsen_US
dc.subjectdigital technologiesen_US
dc.titleEmergency Speaking Communication: Experience from the USA and Europeen_US
dc.title.alternativeМовленнєва комунікація в надзвичайних ситуаціях: американський та європейський досвідen_US
Appears in Collections:2025



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.