Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/19241
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLyashuk, Oleg-
dc.contributor.authorMironov, Dmytro-
dc.contributor.authorMaruschak, Pavlo-
dc.contributor.authorDzyura, Volodymyr-
dc.contributor.authorShevchuk, Viktor-
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-21T08:09:54Z-
dc.date.available2026-10-21T08:09:54Z-
dc.date.issued2026-06-20-
dc.identifier.urihttps://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/19241-
dc.description.abstractAlthough PI and PID controllers are mature control laws, their effect on energy-related variables is rarely isolated in a complete electric vehicle traction model when the plant, controller tuning basis and driving conditions are kept unchanged. A full-system MATLAB/Simulink model was developed, comprising a DC motor with PWM H-bridge, reduction gear, vehicle dynamics and a lithium-ion battery with SOC monitoring. Fixed-gain PI and PID configurations were compared under FTP75, with US06 added as a dynamic-cycle assessment. Speed tracking was evaluated using RMSE, MAE, IAE and ITAE, while energy behavior was assessed through SOC depletion, battery voltage, current and braking-command signals. Under FTP75, both controllers achieved nearly identical tracking accuracy, with an overall RMSE of 0.1525 km/h across the active intervals. Despite this kinematic equivalence, PID reduced SOC depletion by 0.980 percentage points over 4.963 km and produced a less intense but more distributed braking command. The additional 600 s US06 simulation did not confirm a general PID advantage: both controllers reached the same maximum speed and showed practically identical tracking accuracy, while PID did not reduce SOC depletion. The results show that the derivative channel changes the control-command pattern, but it does not automatically improve kinematic or energy performance under fixed-gain tuning.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectelectric vehicle; speed control; PI controller; PID controller; FTP75 driving cycle; US06 driving cycle; battery state of charge; energy efficiency; traction drive modeling; comparative simulationen_US
dc.titleMathematical Modeling and Comparative Evaluation of PI and PID Speed Controllers for Electric Vehicle Traction Systemsen_US
Appears in Collections:2026

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
modelling-07-00100 (3).pdf5.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.