Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/19241Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Lyashuk, Oleg | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Mironov, Dmytro | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Maruschak, Pavlo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Dzyura, Volodymyr | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Shevchuk, Viktor | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-21T08:09:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-21T08:09:54Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-06-20 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/19241 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Although PI and PID controllers are mature control laws, their effect on energy-related variables is rarely isolated in a complete electric vehicle traction model when the plant, controller tuning basis and driving conditions are kept unchanged. A full-system MATLAB/Simulink model was developed, comprising a DC motor with PWM H-bridge, reduction gear, vehicle dynamics and a lithium-ion battery with SOC monitoring. Fixed-gain PI and PID configurations were compared under FTP75, with US06 added as a dynamic-cycle assessment. Speed tracking was evaluated using RMSE, MAE, IAE and ITAE, while energy behavior was assessed through SOC depletion, battery voltage, current and braking-command signals. Under FTP75, both controllers achieved nearly identical tracking accuracy, with an overall RMSE of 0.1525 km/h across the active intervals. Despite this kinematic equivalence, PID reduced SOC depletion by 0.980 percentage points over 4.963 km and produced a less intense but more distributed braking command. The additional 600 s US06 simulation did not confirm a general PID advantage: both controllers reached the same maximum speed and showed practically identical tracking accuracy, while PID did not reduce SOC depletion. The results show that the derivative channel changes the control-command pattern, but it does not automatically improve kinematic or energy performance under fixed-gain tuning. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.subject | electric vehicle; speed control; PI controller; PID controller; FTP75 driving cycle; US06 driving cycle; battery state of charge; energy efficiency; traction drive modeling; comparative simulation | en_US |
| dc.title | Mathematical Modeling and Comparative Evaluation of PI and PID Speed Controllers for Electric Vehicle Traction Systems | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | 2026 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| modelling-07-00100 (3).pdf | 5.31 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.