Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/13628| Title: | Bridging cultures in Europe: exploring language and shared values in interactions |
| Authors: | Verbytska, Lidiia Babii, Iryna Botvyn, Tetiana Konivitska, Tetiana Khlypavka, Halyna |
| Keywords: | intercultural communication, governance structures digitalisation digital literacy cultural differences inclusive strategies |
| Issue Date: | 7-May-2024 |
| Publisher: | Multidisciplinary Science Journal |
| Citation: | Action, C. (2022). The Moral Horizon of the Enlightenment. The Ethos of the Enlightenment and the Discontents of Modernity. London: Routledge, pp. 134- 155. Adanlawo, E. F., Reddy, M. M., & Rugbeer, H. (2021). Intercultural business communication: The implications of language barriers. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(5), 6281-6290. Alves Filho, E., Blotta, V. S. L., & de Jesus, O. F. (2021). University of life, rational and communicative action of a social movement leader. Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo, 6. Athayde, A. L., Alves, L. F. D. S., Paula, P. P. D., & Gomes, A. D. O. (2022). Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration. Cadernos EBAPE. BR, 20, 164-178. Azizah, N. (2021). Communicative Action and Post-Public Sphere Phenomenon. Pallaka: Media and Islamic Communication, 2(1), 32-45. Baires, N. A., Catrone, R., & May, B. K. (2022). On the importance of listening and intercultural communication for actions against racism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15(4), 1042-1049. Baker, W. (2022). From intercultural to transcultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication, 22(3), 280-293. Balakrishnan, S. (2021). The Dynamics of Value Status (es): Through the lens of the Theory of Communicative Action (TCA). Available at SSRN 3900101. Bosse, G. (2022). Does the EU have moral authority? A communicative action perspective on sanctions. Politics and Governance, 10(1), 16-25. Braslauskas, J. (2021). Developing intercultural competences and creativity: The foundation for successful intercultural communication. Creativity studies, 14(1), 197-217. Çamlı, A. Y., Virlanuta, F. O., Palamutçuoğlu, B. T., Bărbuță-Mișu, N., Güler, Ş., & Züngün, D. (2021). A Study on Developing a Communicative Rational Action Scale. Sustainability, 13(11), 6317. Casmir, F. L. (2012). Communication in Eastern Europe: The role of history, culture, and media in contemporary conflicts. Routledge. Christmann, G. B., Knoblauch, H., & Löw, M. (2022). Communicative constructions and the refiguration of spaces: theoretical approaches and empirical studies. Taylor & Francis, p. 300. da Costa, D. C. A., & de Araujo, L. L. R. S. (2021). Restorative Justice as Communicative Action: Balance between System and World of Life. Braz. J. Pub. Pol'y, 11, 650. Dai, X., & Chen, G. M. (Eds.). (2022). Conflict management and intercultural communication: The art of intercultural harmony. Taylor & Francis. Dalum, B., Freeman, C., Simonetti, R., von Tunzelmann, N., & Verspagen, B. (1999). Europe and the information and communication technologies revolution. The Economic Challenge to Europe. Adapting to Innovation Based Growth, 106-129. Dervin, F., & Jacobsson, A. (2022). Intercultural communication education: Broken realities and rebellious dreams. London: Springer. Fernández Gutiérrez, B., Reljanovic Glimäng, M., Sauro, S., & O'Dowd, R. (2022). Preparing Students for Successful Online Intercultural Communication and Collaboration in Virtual Exchange. Journal of International Students, 12, 149-167. Ferri, G. (2022). The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house: decolonising intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication, 22(3), 381-390. Haili, X. (2022). Discursive Struggle in Social Media from the Perspective of Theory of Communicative Action. International Journal of Language & Linguistics, 10, 192, 196. Halman, L., Luijkx, R., & Van Zundert, M. (2005). Atlas of European values. Brill, 8. Verbytska et al. (2024) 8 https://www.malque.pub/ojs/index.php/msj Harvey, L., Tordzro, G., & Bradley, J. (2022). Beyond and besides language: Intercultural communication and creative practice. Language and Intercultural Communication, 22(2), 103-110. Hilabi, I. I., Saputra, A. R., Sa'diyah, C., & Nurhasanah, S. (2021). Communicative Action: Correlation Of Leadership Principles In The Viewpoint Of Muhammad Rasulullah And J. Habermas. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 22, 350. Ho, M. K., Cushman, F., Littman, M. L., & Austerweil, J. L. (2021). Communication in action: Planning and interpreting communicative demonstrations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(11), 2246. Holliday, A. (2021). Intercultural communication: An advanced resource book for students. Routledge. Hua, Z., Jones, R. H., & Jaworska, S. (2022). Acts of distinction at times of crisis: An epistemological challenge to intercultural communication research. Language and Intercultural Communication, 22(3), 312-323. Irshaidat, R., & Borgebund, H. (2021). An ethical reading of the political marketing mix through a Habermasian lens: theory of communicative action. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 15(1), 1-20. Jeko, V. O. (2021). Communicative Action as the Basis of Radical Democracy and Social Order in Jurgen Habermas’s Political Philosophy. Just, N. (2009). Measuring media concentration and diversity: new approaches and instruments in Europe and the US. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 97-117. Kecskes, I. (2021). Intercultural communication and our understanding of language. Langages, (2), 25-42. Li, M., & Li, X. (2022). Gender Differences and Pragmatic Identity Construction of Stance Markers in Business Speeches from the Perspective of Communicative Action Theory. Lecture Notes on Language and Literature. Liu, R. (2022). Perception and production of communicative action. Doctoral dissertation. Liu, Y., Liu, J., & King, B. (2022). Intercultural communicative competence: Hospitality industry and education perspectives. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 30, 100371. Lupak, R. (2020). Modelling the conditions affecting population migration activity in the eastern european region: The case of Ukraine. TEM Journal, 9(2), pp. 507-514. Monti, C., Aiello, L. M., De Francisci Morales, G., & Bonchi, F. (2022). The language of opinion change on social media under the lens of communicative action. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 17920. Mosed, H., Periord, M., & Caboral‐Stevens, M. (2021, October). A concept analysis of intercultural communication. Nursing Forum, 56(4), 993-999. Nouri, M. (2021). A Critique of Foundations of Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action. Journal of Recognition, 13(2), 245-265. Park, Y. S., & Kim, B. S. (2008). Asian and European American cultural values and communication styles among Asian American and European American college students. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(1), 47. Piejka, A., Piaskowska, L., & Okruszek, Ł. (2022). Two means together? Effects of response bias and sensitivity on communicative action detection. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 46(3), 281-298. R’boul, H. (2022). Epistemological plurality in intercultural communication knowledge. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 17(2), 173-188. R’boul, H. (2022). Postcolonial interventions in intercultural communication knowledge: Meta-intercultural ontologies, decolonial knowledges and epistemological polylogue. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 15(1), 75-93. Royka, A., Chen, A., Aboody, R., Huanca, T., & Jara-Ettinger, J. (2022). People infer communicative action through an expectation for efficient communication. Nature Communications, 13(1), 4160. Samuel Oliveira, E., Ruiz-Mora, I. M., Rodriguez-Amat, J. R., & Zeler, I. (2022). Fridays for Future: Analysis of the Fundamental Communicative-Action Patterns of a Hashtagged Global Movement Lead by Stakeholders. Sandberg, F. (2022). Applying Habermas´ theory of communicative action in an analysis of recognition of prior learning. Social Theory and Education Research: Understanding Foucault, Habermas, Bourdieu and Derrida, 141-158. Sattorovich, J. U. (2020). Intercultural Communication: Concept, Essence and Theories of Intercultural Communication. International Journal on Integrated Education, 3(11), 1-4. Semenets-Orlova, I., Shevchuk, R., Plish, B., Moshnin, A., Chmyr, Y., & Poliuliakh, R. (2022). Human-centered approach in new development tendencies of value-oriented public administration: Potential of education. Economic Affairs (New Delhi), 67(5), 899-906. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.5.2022.25 Shytyk, L., & Akimova, A. (2020). Ways of transferring the internal speech of characters: Psycholinguistic projection. Psycholinguistics, 27(2), 361-384. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2020-27-2-361-384 Stolton, S. (2009). Communicating values and benefits of protected areas in Europe. Results of a seminar organised by BfN and EUROPARC Federation at the International Academy for Nature Conservation, Vilm, Germany April, 14. Thornton, J., Grace, D., Spillard, C., Konefal, T., & Tozer, T. C. (2001). Broadband communications from a high-altitude platform: the European HeliNet programme. Electronics & Communication Engineering Journal, 13(3), 138-144. Verhoeven, P., Zerfass, A., & Tench, R. (2011). Strategic orientation of communication professionals in Europe. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 5(2), 95-117. Verhoeven, P., Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Tench, R., & Moreno, A. (2018). Public relations and the rise of hypermodern values: Exploring the profession in Europe. Public Relations Review, 44(4), 471-480. Victor, J. O., & Sunday, A. S. (2021). A critique of communicative action in Jurgen Habermas’philosophy. Amamihe Journal of Applied Philosophy, 19(2). Weizman, E., & Fetzer, A. (2021). The discursive construction of accountability for communicative action to citizens: A contrastive analysis across Israeli and British media discourse. Intercultural Pragmatics, 18(5), 605-632. |
| Series/Report no.: | ;6 |
| Abstract: | Abstract The importance of intercultural communication is particularly significant in today's globalised world, given the continuous growth of cultural diversity and interactions among cultures at various levels, from personal relationships to global political processes. It is crucial to understand the mechanisms that facilitate or hinder effective intercultural exchange for the development of inclusive, tolerant, and respectful societies. This study analyses the impact of governance structures, digitalisation, and emotions on intercultural communication, using the theoretical framework of the theory of communicative action. The research focuses primarily on the European context. Governance structures and social hierarchies significantly shape conditions for intercultural dialogue, often creating barriers to equal exchange of ideas and hindering the voices of marginalized groups from being heard. Digitalisation provides new opportunities for intercultural exchange. However, it is important to ensure equal access to digital technologies and the development of digital literacy. Emotions have been found to influence intercultural communication strongly. Adequate expression and interpretation of emotions can contribute to greater mutual understanding and empathy among representatives of different cultures. The research findings suggest that it is necessary to integrate various strategies to overcome existing barriers in intercultural communication. These strategies include actively involving marginalized groups in dialogue, developing inclusive digital platforms, and focusing on the development of emotional intelligence. The study's conclusions emphasise the importance of a comprehensive approach to understanding and practically applying the principles of intercultural communication. This approach aims to build open, tolerant, and respectful intercultural relations. The results of this study have practical implications for educational institutions, international organisations, governmental structures, and other stakeholders seeking to promote intercultural interaction at various levels. |
| URI: | https://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/13628 |
| Appears in Collections: | 2024 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| e2024ss0705 (1).pdf | 313.51 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.